By: Kirsten Veronica

Kirsten Veronica — Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:54:19 +0000

OMG Shakers! I’m FREAKING OUT.

By: Jim Cripwell

Jim Cripwell — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:55 +0000

Let me expand on this. Why on God’s green earth do we WANT a consensus among scientists? Let me tell two stories from my own experience. When I first studied physics at Cavendish Labs, my mentor went on to be Prof. Sir Gordon Sutherland, head of NPL. He gave me an assingment, and I went to the library, and made a summary of what I could find. I handed it in to him, very proud of myself. The next time me met, he said WTTE, “This is absolutely useless, and not at all what I wanted. I want to know what YOU think on the subject, not a summary of what others think”. In my first job, just after WWII, my boss, I will never forget his name, Nancarrow, told me that my job was to have ideas. He said “I dont mind how many bad ideas you have, just so long as occasionally you have a good one”.That is what science is about so far as I am concerned; people thinking for themselves. It is a lot of bright people looking at the same set of hard data and making up their own minds what the data means. The last thing we want, and it is a complete anathema to science, is to insist that scientists are not allowed to think for themselves, but must agree to some idea that their “superiors” have agreed upon.That is not science. It is certainly not physics. The whole notion that somehow all scientists must think the same way is absolutely preposterous. To repeat, a scientific consensus is an oxymoron. A complete contradiction in terms.

By: a a

a a — Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:10:36 +0000

its reality and more its due to golabal warmin

By: Twitter

Twitter — Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:45:03 +0000

I swear if shit like this doesn’t stop happening, I’ll be pleased.

Comments on: 01/03/2010 – My refridgerator.

By: Kirsten Veronica

By: Jim Cripwell

By: a a

By: Twitter